Investigating Actual Fuel Switching Behaviour among Consumers in Indonesia using the Push-Pull-Mooring Framework

Authors

  • Imas Chandra Pratiwi Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ruth Chania Ukia Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Arizal Putra Pratama Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Eva Aqilah Abu Jalil Management and Science University, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35313/jmi.v6i1.394

Keywords:

Switching Behaviour, Switching Intention, Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM), Fuel Retail, Consumer Behaviour

Abstract

Market controversies in Indonesia’s fuel retail sector have prompted consumers to reconsider their fuel provider choices. However, empirical research examining actual switching behaviour in the fuel retail context using the Push–Pull–Mooring (PPM) framework remains limited. This study investigates actual switching behaviour among Indonesian fuel consumers through the PPM framework. Data were collected from 394 respondents using purposive sampling and analysed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The findings show that push and pull factors significantly shape switching intention, which in turn strongly predicts actual switching behaviour. In contrast to traditional PPM assumptions, mooring factors do not exhibit a significant influence in this context. These results suggest that in habitual and low-complexity services, switching behaviour is predominantly intention-driven. This study extends the PPM framework by demonstrating its context-dependent applicability and providing empirical evidence that mooring factors may play a limited role in routine, low-involvement consumption decisions such as fuel purchasing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Mohmad Sidek, M. H. (2017). Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2022). Editorial Single Item Measures in Psychological Science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 1–5.

Amalia, F. A., Sosianika, A., & Christabel, F. A. (2021). Green Purchase Intention of Indonesian Young Consumers: Extending VAB Framework. Journal of Marketing Innovation (JMI), 1(01), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35313/jmi.v1i01.9

Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The Self-Regulation of Attitudes , Intentions , and Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178–204.

Bansal, H. S., Taylor, S. F., & James, Y. S. (2005). “Migrating” to new service providers: Toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304267928

Chang, I., Shiau, W., Lin, C., & Shih, D. (2023). Consumer Intentions to Switch On-Demand Food Delivery Platforms?: A Perspective from Push-Pull-Mooring Theory. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Eelectronic Commerce Research, 18, 2217–2232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer 18040111 Academic

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In Sage Publication.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In Sage.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_7

Haridasan, A. C., Fernando, A. G., & Balakrishnan, S. (2021). Investigation of consumers’ cross-channel switching intentions: A push-pull-mooring approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(5), 1092–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1918

Hermawan, J. R., Windasari, N. A., & Husnita. (2025). UNDERSTANDING CONSUMER SWITCHING INTENTIONS TOWARD TELKOMSEL ONE IN WEST JAVA: A PUSH-PULL-MOORING MODEL APPROACH. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 9(2), 2243–2259.

Isnitahnia, M. E., Karnowahadi, K., & Nurkhayati, I. (2019). the Effect of Push, Pull and Mooring Factors To Switching Intention of Post-Paid Electrical Customer’S To Prepaid Electrical. JOBS (Jurnal Of Business Studies), 5(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.32497/jobs.v5i1.1674

Jung, J., Han, H., & Oh, M. (2017). Travelers’ switching behavior in the airline industry from the perspective of the push-pull-mooring framework. Tourism Management, 59, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.018

Khalid, S. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research?: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12(September), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662

Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2006). A study of factors that affect user intentions toward email service switching. Information and Management, 43(7), 884–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.08.004

Krishnan, G., & Raghuram, J. N. V. (2024). Exploring factors and contextual applications of the Push-Pull Mooring (PPM) framework in switching intention: A systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024003

Lin, X., & Wu, R. Z. (2021). An Empirical Study on the Dairy Product Consumers’ Intention to Adopt the Food Traceability’s Technology: Push-Pull-Mooring Model Integrated by D&M ISS Model and TPB With ITM. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612889

Lu, H., & Wung, Y. (2021). Applying Transaction Cost Theory and Push-Pull-Mooring Model to Investigate Mobile Payment Switching Behaviors with Well-Established Traditional Financial Infrastructure. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762021000200102

Marx, T. (2025). The push-pull-mooring model of consumer service switching: a meta-analytical review to guide future research. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 35(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-06-2024-0201

Nugraha, A. P. A., & Syafaruddin, A. (2023). Analysis Push-Pull Mooring Factors on Switching Intention Banking Customers. International Journal of Management Science and Application, 2(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.58291/ijmsa.v2i2.124

Ojiaku, O. C., Nkamnebe, A. D., & Nwaizugbo, I. C. (2018). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions among young graduates: perspectives of push-pull-mooring model. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0109-3

Puspapertiwi, E. R., & Pratiwi, I. E. (2025). Warganet Soroti SPBU Swasta Kebanyakan di Jabodetabek, Jabar, dan Jatim, Apa Alasannya? Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2025/03/15/093000965/warganet-soroti-spbu-swasta-kebanyakan-di-jabodetabek-jabar-dan-jatim-apa?page=all&utm

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. https://www.smartpls.com

Robitha, N. R., & Nursalin, K. K. (2025). Pengaruh Push, Pull, dan Mooring Pada Switching Intention Konsumen Pertamina ke Shell. Jurnal Sosial, Ekonomi, Dan Humaniora (SOSIERA), IV(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56244/sosiera.v4i1.929

Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention — Behavior Relations?: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003 PLEASE

Sun, Y., Liu, D., Chen, S., Wu, X., Shen, X. L., & Zhang, X. (2017). Understanding users’ switching behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: An empirical study from the perspective of push-pull-mooring framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.014

Wisesa, Y. D. B. (2025, February 28). Kasus Korupsi, Sentimen Negatif Warganet ke Pertamina Capai 98 Persen. IDN Times. https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/kasus-korupsi-sentimen-negatif-warganet-ke-pertamina-capai-98-persen-00-jkxzp-ccvl5l

Yunita, E., & Munandar, J. M. (2023). The Influence of Push-Pull-Mooring Effects on E-Wallet Customer Switching in Generation Z in DKI Jakarta. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v17i1.1177

Zeng, Z., Li, S., Lian, J. W., Li, J., Chen, T., & Li, Y. (2021). Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework. Land Use Policy, 109(July), 105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105629

Zhou, T. (2016). Examining user switch between mobile stores: A push-pull-mooring perspective. Information Resources Management Journal, 29(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2016040101

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Pratiwi, I. C., Ukia, R. C., Pratama, A. P., & Jalil, E. A. A. (2026). Investigating Actual Fuel Switching Behaviour among Consumers in Indonesia using the Push-Pull-Mooring Framework. Journal of Marketing Innovation (JMI), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.35313/jmi.v6i1.394

Issue

Section

Articles